Mets Score Surgery. The authors prospectively examined the. Functional capacity is quantified and characterized by metabolic equivalents (mets), where excellent is greater than 10 mets, good is 7 to 10 mets, moderate is 4 to 6 mets, and poor is less than.
Some patients undergoing noncardiac surgery are at risk for an adverse cardiovascular event (ie,. Functional capacity (as measured by met score) is associated with prognosis, regardless of stress protocol.
Functional Capacity Is Quantified And Characterized By Metabolic Equivalents (Mets), Where Excellent Is Greater Than 10 Mets, Good Is 7 To 10 Mets, Moderate Is 4 To 6 Mets, And Poor Is Less Than.
A met, or (metabolic equivalent), is described as the amount of energy it costs to complete a task, determined by the amount of oxygen it requires.
Conversely, Patients With A Good.
A protocol for an international multicentre prospective cohort study of cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
Doctors' Clinical Subjective Assessment Of Patients'.
Images References :
Functional Capacity Is Usually Expressed In Metabolic Equivalents (Mets).
Functional capacity is often expressed in terms of metabolic equivalents (mets), where 1 met is the resting or basal oxygen consumption of a.
All Protocols Were Found To Be Valid For.
The authors prospectively examined the.
Functional Capacity Is Quantified And Characterized By Metabolic Equivalents (Mets), Where Excellent Is Greater Than 10 Mets, Good Is 7 To 10 Mets, Moderate Is 4 To 6 Mets, And Poor Is Less Than.
